Directed by
John Turturro
6/10
Woody Allen is both a blessing and a trap. You don’t
expect to put him into your film and retain any trace of identity. And you sure
as hell don’t expect that if you give him the leading part. He does that old
neurotic trick, says a good joke, sucks up all the space from the screen and
makes Fading Gigolo a second-rate
Woody Allen pastiche.
And yet it is Woody Allen who saves this film from
being an all-out bloodless disaster. He is alive. He breathes. He says stuff.
He even has two or three decent (if vaguely familiar) jokes. Rest of the cast
(and this can also apply to the film itself) is generally solipsistic. Sharon
Stone doesn’t really do anything and Vanessa Paradis is duller than death.
John Turturro (who’s directing his fifth film here) is
better, but only marginally. He plays a quiet New York florist, Fioravante, who
is encouraged by Woody Allen’s character (failed used bookstore owner turned
unlikely gigolo) to participate in a ménage à trois involving the latter’s
dermatologist Dr. Parker. The gigolo trade that then ensues is an intriguing
Allen-esque idea, one that – by all means – has lots of potential. And there are
sparks here, bits and pieces of a well-written script that should but doesn’t.
Because I honestly do not care. Half the time Fading Gigolo feels numb and fails to
engage. And when it does, it’s not through the virtues of a strong screenplay
or great acting or Turturro’s exciting filmmaking. It’s because Woody Allen appears
within the frame and shakes things up by simply
doing his thing. No magic involved.
Fading Gigolo
feels like a very shaky, uncertain film that is only slightly above average. It
doesn’t quite realise what to do, how to balance seriousness with humour,
vulgarity with charm. It doesn’t know how to be convincing. Whereas John
Turturro is the one person who should know how to be convincing. After all: when you
do Jesus, you do the Jesus.