Friday, 9 September 2011

Album review: BILL WELLS & AIDAN MOFFAT - Everything's Getting Older


Highlights: Let’s Stop Here, A Short Song To The Moon, Ballad Of The Bastard, (If You) Keep Me In Your Heart, The Greatest Story Ever Told

Everything’s Getting Older is art of relentlessly mature, adult sort. Created by Bill Wells and Arab Strap’s Aidan Moffat, the record is a gorgeous suite of elegant melodies, bitter-sweet lyrics and vibes, and palpable, real-life emotions.

The album’s theme is, naturally, growing old, and it is conveyed with great feeling and conviction. The mood, naturally, is bleak and cheerless. Some of the songs are sung and some are narrated in Aidan’s deeply authentic Scottish accent that gives this album so much personality and charm. Everything’s Getting Older is mostly made up of haunting, stirring piano ballads/instrumentals. But even when Wells and Moffat go for something different, like on the spiky, funky “Glasgow Jubilee”, the results are largely effective (the groove in that one is almost as addictive as it gets). My bet for the best song would be the poignant, affecting “Ballad Of The Bastard” – which is both dirty and deeply, mercilessly moving.

A triumph of delicate and depressing beauty, Everything’s Getting Older is certainly a mood piece. But it’s fantastically tuneful too – a bonus you obviously can’t write off. Terrific stuff.

8/10

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

Album review: THE CROOKES - Chasing After Ghosts


Highlights: Chorus Of Fools, I Remember Moonlight

There’s no question that The Smiths are an inescapable influence on the whole British indie scene. But it looks like some bands have to get a little bit closer to the source than others. The Crookes write the kind of songs The Smiths could have written were Morrissey less depressed and Johnny Marr a merely capable guitarist. And (and this goes without saying) were they seriously lacking in memorable, articulate tunes.

Chasing After Ghosts is The Crookes’ debut, and , sadly, it commits the worst crime a debut album might commit: it’s rather boring. Where’s the punch, where are the gripping, inescapable hooks? It all gets lost amid that grey, jangly sadness of theirs. “Chorus Of Fool” is the standout, but it’s not as if it’s such a smashing classic or a potential hit single. It’s just that its lilting melody might be the album's strongest offering. I could also single out the choruses of “I Remember Moonlight” or “By The Seine”, but then... there’s nothing particularly wrong about the other songs. They are well-written, well-played and well-mumbled in that famed Morrissey-styled way. But… so what?

Intelligent, moderately catchy album. Good album. But so relentlessly NOT GREAT that you would have to wonder why anyone would seriously give a damn.

6/10

Sunday, 4 September 2011

SONG OF THE WEEK #27: Eleanor Friedberger - "Inn Of The Seventh Ray"


I’d always had a feeling Eleanor could do better and it was only her brother who kept dragging her into those jerky, Zappa-esque experiments they were (and are) making as The Fiery Furnaces. And even though their recent I’m Going Away (2009) record was The Furnaces at their poppiest and most accessible, it could not quite prepare me for Eleanor’s first solo record, Last Summer. 

Its second song, “Inn Of The Seventh Ray”, is memorable, beautifully arranged, and full of mystery of non-cheap sort. But it might be her soulful vocals that really make it so special.



Friday, 2 September 2011

Album review: MICK HARVEY - Sketches From The Book Of The Dead


Highlights: October Boy, The Ballad Of Jay Givens, Rhymeless, Frankie T And Frankie C, The Bells Never Rang, How Would I Leave You,

I guess if you’d worked with Nick Cave for more than 30 years, you’ll know a thing or two about death. Sketches From The Book Of The Dead is Mick Harvey’s take on Murder Ballads, and it ends up being not simply Harvey’s strongest set of tunes so far, but one of the best, most thoughtful and artistic statements of the year.

When writing about death, there’s a danger one would get carried away with atmosphere and vibe. And while that is certainly something Harvey is good at, the level of songwriting is unprecedentedly high. Plus, you’d have to consider the fact that unlike some of his previous records when Harvey was interpreting the music of Cave, Gainsbourg and others, Sketches… is all original material. The downbeat melodies are understated yet uniformly poignant, edgy, thrilling. The mood is obviously quite grim and pessimistic, but that’s a given. There’s lots of acoustic guitar and elegant piano, and it’s all sung in that low, soft voice of his. Highlights are numerous, but “Rhymeless” has to be my personal favourite. He does borrow a lot from Cave here (mood of “Sorrow’s Child”, verses of “O Children”), but I wouldn’t take it against him. With a tune so startling.

A dark, beautiful collection of death ballads that is bound to fill your head with imagery and sadness. But that’s a work of art, and Mick Harvey is not here to cure any souls.

9/10

Thursday, 1 September 2011

Book review: MIDDLESEX by Jeffrey Eugenides


“As a rule people don’t notice much”, says Cal Stephanides, the protagonist as well as the narrator of Jeffrey Eugenides’ second novel. A point one would find hard to dispute. But then it certainly isn’t something one could accuse Cal of: the strength of the book is in the detail. The detail rips through the book’s rather conventional narration (some glimpses into Cal’s Berlin future notwithstanding), and makes the whole thing so rich, full, and appealing. 

Middlesex reads like a cross between a saga, a fairytale, and a Bildungsroman. In that sense it is not unlike Salman Rushdie’s seminal Midnight’s Children. Centered around Cal/Callie, the book tells a story of a Greek family and all the numerous hardships and calamities it endures: the Greco-Turkish War, immigration, Depression, riots in Detroit... But that is hardly what gives the novel its edge: it has to be the inclusion of all those whimsical and amusing characters and situations (much like in Midnight’s Children) and, of course, the fact that it is all processed through the sharp, restless eyes of a hermaphrodite. Hence the title.

The novel came almost ten years after Eugenides’ acclaimed debut, The Virgin Suicides (1993; also a successful film by Sofia Coppola). But considering the epic aspect of the book, both quality and quantity considered, this was perhaps fully justified. When it comes to a tale of this density and proportion,  everything has to be thought through and nothing can be overlooked. But this perfectness of the plot (subplots, coincidences, etc.) isn’t in any way grating. Middlesex never seems polished or soulless; on the contrary, it makes for a thoroughly entertaining read. The focal point is the child birth, and it was anything but straightforward. Since Cal’s parents wanted their second child to be a girl, they took all scientific precautions to ensure the right sex of the child – which consisted in a carefully timed intercourse too complicated to comprehend. The trouble was Desdemona, a granite, immovable monument of a grandmother who’d never failed in predicting a child’s sex with her silver spoon (which somehow brings to mind Rushdie’s spittoon). The silver spoon, science against God and modernity against tradition, indicates it will be a boy. Naturally.

The detail I was speaking of earlier comes courtesy of the fact that a hermaphrodite has a chance of seeing a fuller, more vivid picture of the world. And in his reminiscences Cal, a girl who grew into a man, plunges into it all with lots of spirited gusto and sincerity. The downside of it is that you also have to go through numerous medical data that can enhance Middlesex’s credibility but hardly the actual enjoyment of the book.

Throughout Eugenides touches upon a number of sensitive issues: incest, child abuse, teenage sex, etc. , but there’s so much humour and warmth rushing through this thing, that it only adds a great deal of thrilling, irresistible colour to the novel. Having missed too many American novels from 2002, I’m in no position to judge whether The Pulitzer was justified (I can vouch for it being well-deserved, though), but in Middlesex Eugenides managed to create a deeply intelligent page-turner that maybe doesn’t teach us much. But does disclose what it takes to be different. 


9/10