10/10
The Goldfinch
is one of those books where you feel older at the end. You are wiser, but there’s
a price. Your hair’s gone gray and your voice is husky and feeble. You smoke
now. Maybe you’ve quit smoking. And you remember that all those years ago, back
in 2013 or something, Donna Tartt won the Pulitzer Prize for this novel. Long,
long time ago.
Donna Tartt gives ten-year gaps between novels a good
name. Her latest book is so immense (close to 800 pages) and monumental (Nietzsche’s
immortal ‘We have art in order not to die from the truth’ line almost doesn’t
sound excessive) that you’d have to wonder if The Goldfinch is not, in fact, one of those.
Great American novels. Because it has
everything to be one.
Interestingly, it is almost old-fashioned. Despite iPhones
and numerous indie culture references. Despite the fact that we have a Bildungsroman
that has angles ranging from romantic to detective to gangster (the latter is
especially evident in the Amsterdam section of the novel that made me think of
Martin McDonagh’s In Bruges). But you
finish a chapter and the next one follows the story ever so faithfully. Character
descriptions are so complete (though my favourite one is just a brief line of
pure poetry: ‘He was a planet without an atmosphere’). And watch Tartt give you
that ancient but highly effective drama at the end of some of these encounters.
This could be the last time I saw him. I knew I would never see her again. It's 19th century at best, and yet it works so beautifully.
Classic, simple narrative. Reading Tartt’s prose is
like falling in life with the English language again and again. It’s rich, it’s
precise, it’s very lush. Her dialogues are living things. And even when she is
being pretentious, it never comes off that way. She is sharp and to the point. ‘Beauty’,
she writes in a long but fascinating philosophical passage towards the end of
the book, ‘has to be wedded to something meaningful’. Donna Tartt stays true to
her word.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ff53/5ff5311dfb7ab7522d7e75fcd08f1201a5439c65" alt=""
Indeed, it’s like Donna Tartt set out to write the
impossible. The ultimate novel about art. I would not say that it is (how can you?), but it is one hell of an
artistic statement. It is an art
statement. She tries to see that pattern (‘maybe I see a pattern because it’s
there?’), something that would go from William Blake and to Lady Gaga. She got
as close as you can, without burning yourself or compromising the fact that you’re
but an artist. She even named her book The
Goldfinch. How humble is that. How bold.
And it is not just that you’ve grown older. You are at
the point of no return, you are basically dead already. ‘Life is catastrophe’,
with art as its sole saving grace. “The Goldfinch” by Carel Fabritius, painted
in 1654. ‘I was different’, says Theo when he looks at the picture years later,
‘but it wasn’t’.
No comments:
Post a Comment